its REALLY close.powered up but Without boosts it’s bulaga 90 to Collins 85, timmerman 90 to allen 90, 88 linsley to 93 Frederick , and 92 bakhtiari to 89 Smith. Neither team has a solid LG so it’d be 80 billy turner to 88 zack Martin. I think I would take packers because the dominant edge rushers this year but I wouldn’t be afraid to use all Cowboys if I had a Cowboys theme team for sure. The Cowboys line average is actually 89 to the packers 88. Very close.
No blown blocks but only 84 pass block. OK EA
Makes sense if you don’t think about it lol
Nah still doesn’t make sense
Oof, as a Packer fan this kills me, but maybe EA knew the Chargers game in advance. Our O-line got murdered.
West coast 30/30, packers 30/50, packers passing 40/40. Goes to a 90 with good awareness and strength
Packers O line best in the game I’d argue. My team is 93 bulaga, 91 timmerman, 90 linsley, rg billy turner at lg 81. And of course bakhtiari at 95
I think cowboys might have it rn. If elgton jenkins gets an upgrade at LG is a gg
its REALLY close.powered up but Without boosts it’s bulaga 90 to Collins 85, timmerman 90 to allen 90, 88 linsley to 93 Frederick , and 92 bakhtiari to 89 Smith. Neither team has a solid LG so it’d be 80 billy turner to 88 zack Martin. I think I would take packers because the dominant edge rushers this year but I wouldn’t be afraid to use all Cowboys if I had a Cowboys theme team for sure. The Cowboys line average is actually 89 to the packers 88. Very close.
I think Brian Waters might argue your comment about no LG
Whoops. My bad. Yeah in that case the Cowboys middle is quite a bit better. I’d still take the packers for their tackles against the edge rush though