Quote from tdkjesse >>
Thanks for the response Messina, personally I wouldn't respond again. They're just gonna make the same arguments tomorrow with Dickerson and his 88 carry still in the lineup, pretending that fumbles per drive is a more meaningful statistic than fumbles per carry.
Wouldn't fumbles per tackle be more relevant? In the early months of the game it was much easier to break large runs for TDs. Why would you use carrys that go untouched in the data?
Quote from tdkjesse >> Thanks for the response Messina, personally I wouldn't respond again. They're just gonna make the same arguments tomorrow with Dickerson and his 88 carry still in the lineup, pretending that fumbles per drive is a more meaningful statistic than fumbles per carry.
Wouldn't fumbles per tackle be more relevant? In the early months of the game it was much easier to break large runs for TDs. Why would you use carrys that go untouched in the data?