yea I mean, I can understand if a large defensive end has never played dt in his career or doesn't have the strength, you would give them a hit for playing out of position. But, if anything suh should get a boost for playing DT. Plus, 3-4 RE's are basically 3 tech's in a 4-3, they shouldn't take a position debuff for that anyways. I've been feeling like for a while, there should be 2 specifically marked DT slots. One designated Nose tackle and one designated 3 technique. 3-4 ends should take no debuff for playing 3 tech and 4-3, 3 techs shouldn't take a debuff playing 3-4 end.
I would love if they added that in. I run a 4-3 and a lot of coaches do use a NT/1 tech, I'd like to do the same but there is no way to ensure that your big guy ends up the NT/1. Also I'm sure the loss is due to AWR but agree that it should never be a ding like that to move guys around on the DL.
Makes zero sense! Look at him compared to John Henderson https://www.muthead.com/20/compare/51628-52201/
yea I mean, I can understand if a large defensive end has never played dt in his career or doesn't have the strength, you would give them a hit for playing out of position. But, if anything suh should get a boost for playing DT. Plus, 3-4 RE's are basically 3 tech's in a 4-3, they shouldn't take a position debuff for that anyways. I've been feeling like for a while, there should be 2 specifically marked DT slots. One designated Nose tackle and one designated 3 technique. 3-4 ends should take no debuff for playing 3 tech and 4-3, 3 techs shouldn't take a debuff playing 3-4 end.
I would love if they added that in. I run a 4-3 and a lot of coaches do use a NT/1 tech, I'd like to do the same but there is no way to ensure that your big guy ends up the NT/1. Also I'm sure the loss is due to AWR but agree that it should never be a ding like that to move guys around on the DL.
My friends, we have learnt about Archetypes and just how much sense they make with this card