Quote from natehello >>
Seriously?
I don't mind someone choosing not to invest in a kicker because its not good bang for the buck. I do think getting rid of a good kicker to take advantage of an unrealistic game feature is kind of wrong.
All I can say is, I hope none of you are the people complaining about "unrealistic bombs". If you want to take advantage of questionable programming, be ready for it to be thrown back at you.
Huh, how is this unrealistic? It happens in real football all the time, it's a strategy to kick it short and make them return it. Maybe they fumble, maybe they don't get it to the 25. There are disadvantages to this too, maybe they let it bounce and it goes out of bounds and they get to start at the 40, maybe they return it past the 25, maybe they take it to the house. It is not as unrealistic as throwing 75+ yard bombs 3 straight drives, how often does that happen in the NFL?
Quote from natehello >> Seriously? I don't mind someone choosing not to invest in a kicker because its not good bang for the buck. I do think getting rid of a good kicker to take advantage of an unrealistic game feature is kind of wrong.
All I can say is, I hope none of you are the people complaining about "unrealistic bombs". If you want to take advantage of questionable programming, be ready for it to be thrown back at you.
Huh, how is this unrealistic? It happens in real football all the time, it's a strategy to kick it short and make them return it. Maybe they fumble, maybe they don't get it to the 25. There are disadvantages to this too, maybe they let it bounce and it goes out of bounds and they get to start at the 40, maybe they return it past the 25, maybe they take it to the house. It is not as unrealistic as throwing 75+ yard bombs 3 straight drives, how often does that happen in the NFL?