OK sure, then it's objectively stupid to call a card a 90 when only 2 stats only one of which is relevant to a running back is above or at 90.... their formula means nothing to how stupid that is
A) not how those words work. B) He's a receiving back, so his catching and SRR will have more weight than some of his running stats. Compare him to TGIII, He's got higher AGI and ACC, lower running stats, but much higher receiving stats.
Overalls have never worked like that in Madden. It makes zero sense to do an average of stats because either the starting overalls would be so low no one would want to play or the cards would be so good out the gate you would have almost no reason to upgrade until the end of the Madden cycle due to cards basically hitting the max stat thresholds.
They're not subjective, they're objective. Why do we still have comments like these year after year? There's a formula in place for every position.
OK sure, then it's objectively stupid to call a card a 90 when only 2 stats only one of which is relevant to a running back is above or at 90.... their formula means nothing to how stupid that is
A) not how those words work. B) He's a receiving back, so his catching and SRR will have more weight than some of his running stats. Compare him to TGIII, He's got higher AGI and ACC, lower running stats, but much higher receiving stats.
Overalls have never worked like that in Madden. It makes zero sense to do an average of stats because either the starting overalls would be so low no one would want to play or the cards would be so good out the gate you would have almost no reason to upgrade until the end of the Madden cycle due to cards basically hitting the max stat thresholds.