Nah. Flipping cards for 600-900 coin margin is, objectively, stupid low. Opening 20 packs, posting 20 cards all for a whooping 20k profit is, objectively, stupid tough when one considers that someone can easily flip 1 card with a similar profit margin.
Using the word "stupid" as an adjective to describe a profit margin and an amount of work is not a comment on a person, nor was it a comment upon his idea directly.
Adverb or not the word "Stupid" makes people defensive and generates a personal and emotional response. You can insult me ALL you want but YOUR comment was received personally by the writer. That means YOUR message, regardless of content or implication, was not received in context. That is only your fault.
I didn't. I did point out that the required resources of time, coins and auction block slots make this a joke of a post and a joke of a method.
Just because something is profitable, doesn't mean it's worthy of anyone's resources of time, coins and auction block slots, when considering all of the other options.
I encourage you to keep doing this if you think it suits you.
That's a little too personal when all I did was post some math, don't you think?
And then you called his idea "stupid"
Nah. Flipping cards for 600-900 coin margin is, objectively, stupid low. Opening 20 packs, posting 20 cards all for a whooping 20k profit is, objectively, stupid tough when one considers that someone can easily flip 1 card with a similar profit margin.
Using the word "stupid" as an adjective to describe a profit margin and an amount of work is not a comment on a person, nor was it a comment upon his idea directly.
Please read more carefully!
Anytime you refer to anyone's idea as "stupid", objective or not, you have now made it personal.
Please type more considerately, thank you!
Nah. Stupid was clearly being used as an adverb. You read at a 1st grade level. 😂😂😂
Adverb or not the word "Stupid" makes people defensive and generates a personal and emotional response. You can insult me ALL you want but YOUR comment was received personally by the writer. That means YOUR message, regardless of content or implication, was not received in context. That is only your fault.
Perhaps if I had used the word "crazy" or " silly" or "very" you wouldn't be crying so many tasty tears?
😂😂😂
Exactly
You agreed that it was profitable and still called it stupid bro lol you can’t go broke taken a profit
I didn't. I did point out that the required resources of time, coins and auction block slots make this a joke of a post and a joke of a method.
Just because something is profitable, doesn't mean it's worthy of anyone's resources of time, coins and auction block slots, when considering all of the other options.
I encourage you to keep doing this if you think it suits you.