Not saying you're wrong, ratings certainly are made up to an extent, but Adams's INT numbers are a bit skewed because he plays down in the box on most plays and goes for sacks way more than INT's. If he lined up and played like a traditional SS he would have way more INT's and almost no sacks, so his coverage ratings aren't based solely on INT's, and they shouldn't be because of how he is used
Not saying you're wrong, ratings certainly are made up to an extent, but Adams's INT numbers are a bit skewed because he plays down in the box on most plays and goes for sacks way more than INT's. If he lined up and played like a traditional SS he would have way more INT's and almost no sacks, so his coverage ratings aren't based solely on INT's, and they shouldn't be because of how he is used
He’s definitely one of the greatest box players in the NFL, but I have watched enough of his games to know that he isn’t a high 90s Zone guy.