Your example is a complete fallacy. First, as pointed out casinos use real money not fake cards in a game. Second, if a casino dropped odds the way EA does they would be out of business within weeks. (Crap odds=no customers) people talk. Thirdly, if casino x changed odds and made it to where all machines where $20 slots everyone would simple leave and go to casino y. Basic economics. The problem here is that EA has a monopoly because there is no casino Y. Therefore they do as they please. Now instead of coming on here and calling out those that are doing something and calling those that support them stupid. Give us your solution to EA destroying a game, that I paid $100 for, without notifying me before the change was made. If they had told me Madden 23 was pay to play I would have passed on Madden 23. It had not been that way in years past.
Your example is a complete fallacy. First, as pointed out casinos use real money not fake cards in a game. Second, if a casino dropped odds the way EA does they would be out of business within weeks. (Crap odds=no customers) people talk. Thirdly, if casino x changed odds and made it to where all machines where $20 slots everyone would simple leave and go to casino y. Basic economics. The problem here is that EA has a monopoly because there is no casino Y. Therefore they do as they please. Now instead of coming on here and calling out those that are doing something and calling those that support them stupid. Give us your solution to EA destroying a game, that I paid $100 for, without notifying me before the change was made. If they had told me Madden 23 was pay to play I would have passed on Madden 23. It had not been that way in years past.
yup agree
Casinos do have odds that are known. It’s simple probabilities.
And their odds are regulated by Gaming Control. EA isn't regulated, this is the problem.