Barr vs Hendricks
Quote from PK67 >> Hendricks played DE ? I don't remember that.
Oh wait.. People put players at OOP because they cannot win with players at their natural positions.. I forgot.
Carry on.
Your salt can melt ice lol.
For OP: SB Hendricks played end or me and he did very well. I imagine the UL being just as good or better
Quote from wickedshadows72069 >> I run 34 and have both plus ul Ware, powered up BWags and still run combine Shaz. I move these guys all over man! Playing online I like to put Hendricks at DE with Chubb on the other end leaving Barr outside for an epic speed rush. Other setup is I put Barr at MLB 1 leaving Hendricks at olb and putting in too tall jones at end which really helps against the Mike Vick garbage and the outside runs. I love all these guys together the options are endless.
ah man, i had to ditch too tall because he got burned so much. Sucks that the natural LE's in this game have such poor stats.
I run 34 and have both plus ul Ware, powered up BWags and still run combine Shaz. I move these guys all over man! Playing online I like to put Hendricks at DE with Chubb on the other end leaving Barr outside for an epic speed rush. Other setup is I put Barr at MLB 1 leaving Hendricks at olb and putting in too tall jones at end which really helps against the Mike Vick garbage and the outside runs. I love all these guys together the options are endless.
Barr hitting the 91zone threshold has been a huge plus for me. I had Mack when I got him and he was a liablilty in coverage because he didn’t hit 91 zone.
Quote from edjwen1 >>
Quote from saadmurt >> have hendricks at le and barr at lolb. Solved
That sounds interesting, but not sure how Hendricks would play in a 3-4 as an end. How he play for you there?
Quote from
Quote from PK67 >> Hendricks played DE ? I don't remember that.
Oh wait.. People put players at OOP because they cannot win with players at their natural positions.. I forgot.
Carry on.
https://www.muthead.com/18/players/compare/22406/32436 please tell me a major difference between these two players when you put them at de. And besides, im not overpaying a player when i can get the same production for half the price or less. So please, stop being a smartass and think your cool
Quote from PK67 >> Hendricks played DE ? I don't remember that.
Oh wait.. People put players at OOP because they cannot win with players at their natural positions.. I forgot.
Carry on.
He actually started his NFL career at DE
Hendricks played DE ? I don't remember that.
Oh wait.. People put players at OOP because they cannot win with players at their natural positions.. I forgot.
Carry on.
I sold ted after 3 games with Barr.. Hes sooooooooo fast and agile for an olb.
Man it’s all about having fun. I run Mack at RE in my 3-4 and he plays fine. ST and O on linebackers in a 3-4 is crazy good. Who are you ushering? IMO bar is the best user. You could argue shazier but -2 speed is made up with by bars height and he is way more agile. Get the Barr card and user him.
Quote from saadmurt >> have hendricks at le and barr at lolb. Solved
That sounds interesting, but not sure how Hendricks would play in a 3-4 as an end. How he play for you there?
In a 3-4 whose better? Got Hendricks right now whose solid and Barr looks great, but not sure how he’d do in a 3-4 with the low strength. How he compare?