I bought him cause he is so cheap and put him at Rt thomas at lt. Lt has lots of options rt doesn’t currently
Hes a good card but its a position with a lot of options and they seemed to flood the market.
I think it’s just the amp not of NATs at that position. I picked Whitworth as one of my NATs from the Lawrence Taylor set, so I can’t justify spending coin to upgrade there just yet. A lot of the sets that give back NATs and a set master seem to include LTs as an option.
Quote from Staubach12 >> May be somewhat due to high end Left Tackle overload compared to other positions (PH Smith, UL Jones, LTD. Thomas)
I also believe this
I sold my 94 chad Johnson to buy another wr! I saw I couldn’t afford him so bought a legends pack and pulled Rod Woodson in the second round and Pace in the final round! Got my wr and some help on defense
May be somewhat due to high end Left Tackle overload compared to other positions (PH Smith, UL Jones, LTD. Thomas)
I pulled two, Tyron Smith fits all my chems and balls out so I was excited and then saw the undercutting lol. Still, coins are coins.
I pulled one in the 91+ BB exchange set.
Gonna keep for now, would sell if his price goes up.
Same thing as mariota just too many of them at a position that’s not overly expensive. Most peeps are happy with their freebie LTs, bb peters, gauntlet penn, mf peters etc.
He will go up. Bought two this afternoon. Will sell one after I figure out if I want ptr for his benefit or gd for my teams.
UL LTDs have been really easy to pull. Many people ripping packs due to Ray Lewis. Undercutting prices and high inventory is my guess.
looks decent but why so cheap