Another case of Madden logic
I have 96 PU Mack who had been really solid for me however after looking at Danielle Hunter I thought he'd def be the better fit in my 4-3, Nickel Wide 9 + Big Nickel. He's been a complete ghost. I subbed both of them in and out over several games and Mack has 2 or 3x as many sacks and pressures. I guess thats what you get you when you get caught up with the rating on muthead and try to apply logic to this game. Some cards just play better than others - no matter if they are a fit in your scheme
Quote from mottiyos >> d line is a mystery this year, especially after the lastest patch, non effective at all, especially against the run. i don't think the problem is with HUNTER
Hughes is a monster for me in every game but overall i think you're right Dline seems to more or less disappear at times
Quote from luk1887 >> I have 96 PU Mack who had been really solid for me however after looking at Danielle Hunter I thought he'd def be the better fit in my 4-3, Nickel Wide 9 + Big Nickel. He's been a complete ghost. I subbed both of them in and out over several games and Mack has 2 or 3x as many sacks and pressures. I guess thats what you get you when you get caught up with the rating on muthead and try to apply logic to this game. Some cards just play better than others - no matter if they are a fit in your scheme
This! I just play guys I like. See what they do. I play Ware at ROLB and he is a beast
I have 96 PU Mack who had been really solid for me however after looking at Danielle Hunter I thought he'd def be the better fit in my 4-3, Nickel Wide 9 + Big Nickel. He's been a complete ghost. I subbed both of them in and out over several games and Mack has 2 or 3x as many sacks and pressures. I guess thats what you get you when you get caught up with the rating on muthead and try to apply logic to this game. Some cards just play better than others - no matter if they are a fit in your scheme